Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

28.8

Rank #313 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 25.3.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
ProviderBaiduGoogle
Noometry Index41.228.8
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Coding14551034
HumanEval+—17.7%
MBPP+—23.3%

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14461005
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Math14371047

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Expert1427970

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Non-English1436988
LMArena Chinese15121011
LMArena German1462944
LMArena Korean1406899
LMArena Russian1446990
LMArena French1466—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following1413992

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query14221003

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Text14451022
LMArena Creative Writing1426998
LMArena Multi-Turn1433958

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper