Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen3-1.7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Dolly 2.0-12b leads 27.3 to 16.3.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen3-1.7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.