Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 51.8 to 38.7.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderDatabricksMicrosoft
Noometry Index25.529.7
Released2023-04-112024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding7761039
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts8041028
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67—
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math8711089

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert—984
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multilingual Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English8361000
LMArena Chinese8361016
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Russian—1004
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following8141023

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—996

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text8511050
LMArena Creative Writing8641024
LMArena Multi-Turn740989

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper