Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 51.8 to 38.7.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1028 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1089 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.