Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and o3-mini in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.1 to 38.7.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and o3-mini specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
ProviderDatabricksOpenAI
Noometry Index25.536.7
Released2023-04-112024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1751

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
LMArena Coding7761378
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Too close to call

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts8041366
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67140.34
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
ForecastBench—59.6
HellaSwag70.8%—
LiveBench—75.9%
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Too close to call

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
LMArena Expert—1364
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multilingual o3-mini leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
LMArena Non-English8361319
LMArena Chinese8361379
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following8141337
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
Fiction.LiveBench—50%
LMArena Longer Query—1343

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bo3-mini
LMArena Text8511337
LMArena Creative Writing8641286
LMArena Multi-Turn7401320
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and o3-mini share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper