Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

24.9

Rank #339 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.5

Rank #81 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.3 to 15.3.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
ProviderDatabricksMiniMax
Noometry Index24.943.5
Released2023-04-112026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1741

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), MiniMax-M3: 41.5 (#111)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding7761470
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.5 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), MiniMax-M3: 29.3 (#83)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts8041447
Epoch Capabilities Index88.94147
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
ForecastBench—61.4
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), MiniMax-M3: 39.1 (#83)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math8711432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#32)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
LMArena Expert—1462
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiniMax-M3: 39.5 (#45)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1254
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), MiniMax-M3: 53.2 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English8361420
LMArena Chinese8361465
LMArena French—1445
LMArena German—1424
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Russian—1430
LMArena Spanish—1431

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), MiniMax-M3: 75.7 (#56)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following8141433

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#68)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query—1445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), MiniMax-M3: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text8511433
LMArena Creative Writing8641405
LMArena Multi-Turn7401441
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and MiniMax-M3 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper