Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 44.4 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1516 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1481 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1477 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1516 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1424 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1463 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1465 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.