Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.3 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 47.8 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-01-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.25 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Kimi K2.5: 48.7 (#48)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1474 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 73.8% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 70.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1436 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 67.3% |
| SciCode | — | 49% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 821.65 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.5: 34.0 (#44)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 43.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 63.3% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,198 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#74)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1454 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | 148.05 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 11.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 46.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 78.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 69.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 65.3% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.4% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Kimi K2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Kimi K2.5: 50.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1470 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 62.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 92.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 27.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#52)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 24.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1466 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.5: 40.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1430 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Kimi K2.5: 54.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1433 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Kimi K2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1431 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 86.1% |
| CL-bench | — | 19.3% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 13.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Kimi K2.5: 65.3 (#51)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1423 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1444 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Kimi K2.5 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.