Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 57.2 to 15.2.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderDatabricksxAI
Noometry Index25.541.4
Released2023-04-112025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Coding7761411
LMArena WebDev—1242
ALE-Bench—394.93

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts8041407
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
DTBench—87.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67—
ForecastBench—61
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Math8711408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%
LMArena Expert—1399
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English8361391
LMArena Chinese8361441
LMArena French—1415
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1413

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following8141376

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query—1390

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text8511408
LMArena Creative Writing8641394
LMArena Multi-Turn7401389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper