Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 81.9 to 15.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 65.6 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-09-29 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1487 |
| DeepSWE | — | 75.2% |
| FrontierCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1755 |
| SciCode | — | 55.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 60% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 32% |
Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1466 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 166.09 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 94.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 95.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98.5% |
| CritPt | — | 31.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 61% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 54.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 80% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1464 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 93.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 100% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 95.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1502 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1288 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 80% |
Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1438 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1477 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1455 |
Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1468 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1465 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1432 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1449 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GPT-6.1 Sol?
GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GPT-6.1 Sol share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.