Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs GLM-4.5-Air
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 55.9 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2025-07-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5-Air leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1397 |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1379 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.2 |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math GLM-4.5-Air leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1396 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1370 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1426 |
| LMArena French | — | 1399 |
| LMArena German | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1386 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1354 |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1371 |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GLM-4.5-Air?
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?
GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GLM-4.5-Air share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.