Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemma 3 27B

Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.5 to 15.2.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 3 27B specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
ProviderDatabricksGoogle
Noometry Index25.530.8
Released2023-04-112025-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.08
Output $ / M tokens—$0.16
Results tracked1743

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
LMArena Coding7761322
Aider Polyglot—4.9%
SciCode—21.2%
LiveBench Coding—39.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—29.5%

Reasoning Gemma 3 27B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts8041340
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67130.04
Kagi LLM Benchmark—40.4%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—43.8%
DTBench—52.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—51.5%
LMCA—12.3%
HellaSwag70.8%—
LiveBench—50%
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
LMArena Math8711312
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—22.5%
LiveBench Math—55.4%
MATH Level 5—74%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
GPQA Diamond—47.7%
Confabulations—40.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
LMArena Expert—1304
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
LMArena Vision—1164
GeoBench—52%

Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
LMArena Non-English8361334
LMArena Chinese8361346
LMArena French—1368
LMArena German—1362
LMArena Japanese—1287
LMArena Korean—1308
LMArena Russian—1349
LMArena Spanish—1349

Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
LMArena Instruction Following8141321
LiveBench Instruction Following—74.9%

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
Fiction.LiveBench—33.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1333

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemma 3 27B
LMArena Text8511358
LMArena Creative Writing8641346
LMArena Multi-Turn7401345
Short-Story Creative Writing—79.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1266
LiveBench Language—34.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (23.4 vs 22.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 3 27B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper