Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

24.9

Rank #339 Confirmed

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #29 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 65.5 to 15.3.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemini 3.5 Flash specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
ProviderDatabricksGoogle
Noometry Index24.954.1
Released2023-04-112026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$9
Results tracked1754

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding7761492
SWE-bench Verified—79.3%
DeepSWE—37.4%
LMArena WebDev—1499
SciCode—53.1%
WeirdML—62.6%
ALE-Bench—911.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
APEX-Agents—27.5%
GBAEval—6.7%
GDP.pdf—14%
Vending-Bench 2—5,396

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts8041488
Epoch Capabilities Index88.94154.55
ARC-AGI-2—72.1%
SimpleBench—76.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—92.6%
ARC-AGI-1—92.5%
CritPt—13.1%
Chess Puzzles—50%
EnigmaEval—25.4%
EBR-Bench—4.8%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—47.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—58.1%
ForecastBench—59
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30)

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond—92.8%
SimpleQA Verified—66.2%
LMArena Expert—1493
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision—1311
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.6%
LMArena Document—1463

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English8361475
LMArena Chinese8361525
LMArena French—1490
LMArena German—1500
LMArena Japanese—1481
LMArena Korean—1453
LMArena Russian—1491
LMArena Spanish—1478

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following8141466

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1481

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text8511481
LMArena Creative Writing8641467
LMArena Multi-Turn7401482
EQ-Bench 4—1087

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemini 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.1 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemini 3.5 Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper