Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1035 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1049 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.