Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Step 5 Preview in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 24.1.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Step 5 Preview specifications
Seed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
ProviderByteDance SeedStepFun
Noometry Index43.247.9
Released2026-02-142026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K1.02M
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$1
Output $ / M tokens$3$2.70
Results tracked2018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding14721480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14531465
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
CritPt—20.9%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math14391470
ProofBench—42%

Knowledge Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert14401470

Multimodal Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision12741267

Multilingual Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English14411432
LMArena Chinese14891519
LMArena Russian14491436
LMArena Spanish14601439
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1442—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14141444

Long Context Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query14281455

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text14481442
LMArena Creative Writing14061410
LMArena Multi-Turn14411447

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Step 5 Preview?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Step 5 Preview share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper