Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Nova Premier 1.0

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 51.0.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Nova Premier 1.0 specifications
Seed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
ProviderByteDance SeedAmazon
Noometry Index43.238.3
Released2026-02-142025-04-30
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K1M
Max output128K10K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$3$12.50
Results tracked206

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Coding1472—

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1453—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
Omni-MATH—35%
LMArena Math1439—

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1440—

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1441—
LMArena Chinese1489—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1442—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Russian1449—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Nova Premier 1.0?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Nova Premier 1.0?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper