Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Large

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Large in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 40.7.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Mistral Large.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
  • Mistral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProMistral Large
ProviderByteDance SeedMistral AI
Noometry Index43.231.9
Released2026-02-142024-02-26
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K131K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$2
Output $ / M tokens$3$6
Results tracked2051

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Coding14721277
SciCode—36.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—30%
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—38.3%
ALE-Bench—264.7
HumanEval+—62.2%
MBPP+—59.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—38.4%

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Hard Prompts14531257
SimpleBench—22.5%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
CritPt—0%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—43.5%
DTBench—65.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—50.1%
LMCA—16.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench—48.4%

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Math14391262
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.5%
Omni-MATH—28.1%
LiveBench Math—42.5%
MATH Level 5—50.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Expert14401232
GPQA Diamond—51.3%
MMLU-Pro—59.9%
Confabulations—21.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.5%
GPQA (HELM)—43.5%
MMLU—80%

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Mistral Large: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Non-English14411237
LMArena Chinese14891240
LMArena French14711325
LMArena German14421254
LMArena Japanese14081188
LMArena Korean14111202
LMArena Russian14491257
LMArena Spanish14601268

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Instruction Following14141249
LiveBench Instruction Following—67.9%
IFEval—87.7%

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Longer Query14281261

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Large
LMArena Text14481266
LMArena Creative Writing14061243
LMArena Multi-Turn14411260
Short-Story Creative Writing—69%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—985
WildBench—80.1%
LiveBench Language—39.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Large?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Mistral Large?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Mistral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Mistral Large better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Mistral Large share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper