Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiniMax M1

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

39.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax M1 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 53.3.
  • MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
  • MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and MiniMax M1 specifications
Seed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
ProviderByteDance SeedMiniMax
Noometry Index42.539.7
Released2026-02-142025-06-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K1M
Max output128K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$3$2.20
Results tracked2018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Coding14721359

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts14531340
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Thematic Generalization57.1%—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Math14401360

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Expert14401316

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), MiniMax M1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Vision1275—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English14421320
LMArena Chinese14901361
LMArena French14701369
LMArena German14431350
LMArena Japanese14081220
LMArena Korean14121263
LMArena Russian14501330
LMArena Spanish14601354

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following14141312

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query14281326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiniMax M1
LMArena Text14481343
LMArena Creative Writing14061298
LMArena Multi-Turn14411335

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiniMax M1?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 39.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper