Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 43.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 28.4% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 34.4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderByteDance SeedXiaomi
Noometry Index43.245.2
Released2026-02-142026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.87
Results tracked2027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding14721503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%34.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14531488
CritPt—4%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math14391481
ProofBench—22%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert14401503

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English14411449
LMArena Chinese14891507
LMArena French14711488
LMArena German14421458
LMArena Japanese14081412
LMArena Korean14111437
LMArena Russian14491450
LMArena Spanish14601471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14141477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14281483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text14481465
LMArena Creative Writing14061440
LMArena Multi-Turn14411477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper