Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Magistral Small

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Small costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 24.1 to 6.8.
  • Magistral Small is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Magistral Small specifications
Seed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
ProviderByteDance SeedMistral AI
Noometry Index43.230.2
Released2026-02-142025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K128K
Max output128K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$3$1.50
Results tracked2010

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
SciCode—35.2%
LMArena Coding1472—

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—6.3%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—3%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1453—
DTBench—61.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—133.19

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30%
LMArena Math1439—

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
LMArena Expert1440—

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Magistral Small: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Magistral Small: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
LMArena Non-English1441—
LMArena Chinese1489—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1442—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Russian1449—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Magistral Small: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Magistral Small: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Magistral Small: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Small
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Magistral Small?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Small costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Magistral Small?

Magistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Magistral Small better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Magistral Small share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper