Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-5.4 Pro

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index. Seed 2.0 Pro costs 60× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI

58.9

Rank #18 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 24.1.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
  • GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and GPT-5.4 Pro specifications
Seed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
ProviderByteDance SeedOpenAI
Noometry Index43.258.9
Released2026-02-142026-03-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K1.05M
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$30
Output $ / M tokens$3$180
Results tracked2016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
WeirdML—57.4%
LMArena Coding1472—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
ARC-AGI-2—83.3%
SimpleBench—74.1%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—30%
Chess Puzzles—58.6%
EnigmaEval—23.8%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1453—
Epoch Capabilities Index—158.93

Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—82.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4—58.5%
LMArena Math1439—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—50%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—37.5%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
GPQA Diamond—94.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—44.3%
SimpleQA Verified—46.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.3%
LMArena Expert1440—

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Non-English1441—
LMArena Chinese1489—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1442—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Russian1449—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index. Seed 2.0 Pro costs 60× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or GPT-5.4 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or GPT-5.4 Pro better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 43.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and GPT-5.4 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 Pro has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper