Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-5.3 Codex

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Seed 2.0 Pro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.5

Rank #61 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.5 to 42.9.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
  • GPT-5.3 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and GPT-5.3 Codex specifications
Seed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
ProviderByteDance SeedOpenAI
Noometry Index42.545.5
Released2026-02-142026-02-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K400K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$1.75
Output $ / M tokens$3$14
Results tracked208

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.5 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
SWE-bench Verified—74.8%
LMArena WebDev—1408
WeirdML—79.3%
LMArena Coding1472—
ALE-Bench—1,655

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.3 Codex: 47.8 (#9)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
Terminal-Bench—78.4%
METR Time Horizons—74.5%
Vending-Bench 2—5,940

Reasoning Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1453—
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.84

Math Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
LMArena Math1440—

Knowledge Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
LMArena Expert1440—

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
LMArena Vision1275—

Multilingual Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
LMArena Non-English1442—
LMArena Chinese1490—
LMArena French1470—
LMArena German1443—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1412—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), GPT-5.3 Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than GPT-5.3 Codex?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Seed 2.0 Pro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or GPT-5.3 Codex?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or GPT-5.3 Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.5 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.3 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and GPT-5.3 Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Codex has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper