Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 1B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 39.6 to 7.1.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 20.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 19.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | — |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 1B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 1B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.