Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 39.3 to 22.1.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 33.2 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1261 |
| WeirdML | — | 24.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.1% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 75.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 67.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 14.6% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1257 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 53.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.36 |
| ForecastBench | — | 53.9 |
| PIQA | — | 87.5% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1269 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.3% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 30.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 61.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | — | 82.4% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1233 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 67.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 43.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 85.8% |
| MMLU | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1141 |
| Video-MME | — | 70.3% |
| GeoBench | — | 76% |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1278 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1295 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1258 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1262 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1252 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1221 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1243 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1258 |
| IFEval | — | 83.1% |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1284 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1287 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1285 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1253 |
| WildBench | — | 79.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42.