Model comparison
Devstral Small 2505 vs Qwen1.5-110B
Devstral Small 2505 and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.3 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Devstral Small 2505 leads 38.9 to 33.0.
Side by side
| Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2025-05-07 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Devstral Small 2505 leads
Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Devstral Small 2505 and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.3 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Devstral Small 2505 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.