Model comparison
Devstral Small 2505 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 25.2 to 19.7.
Side by side
| Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-05-07 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Devstral Small 2505 leads
Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
Math Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |
Long Context Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Devstral Small 2505 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.