Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs Mistral Small 3.1

Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

33.9

Rank #228 Reported

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.4

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $0.56 for Mistral Small 3.1.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Devstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Noometry Index33.931.4
Released2025-05-072025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K128K
Max output128K102K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.56
Results tracked428

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Devstral Small 2505: 38.6 (#160), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
SciCode28.8%—
LMArena Coding—1309

Reasoning Too close to call

Devstral Small 2505: 19.1 (#243), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1278
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%
LMArena Math—1261

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%
LMArena Expert—1258

Multimodal Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English—1255
LMArena Chinese—1254
LMArena French—1270
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1210
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
IFEval—75%
LMArena Instruction Following—1264

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query—1300

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text—1278
LMArena Creative Writing—1253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1270

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or Mistral Small 3.1?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 lists at $0.35 and $0.56.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper