Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

34.3

Rank #233 Reported

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 43.8 to 38.9.
  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Devstral Small 2505 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
Devstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index34.343.0
Released2025-05-072026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.87
Results tracked423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
LMArena WebDev—1433
SciCode28.8%—
LMArena Coding—1476
ALE-Bench—785.17

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
CritPt0%—
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math—1447

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert—1478

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1416
LMArena Chinese—1456
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Russian—1427
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1445

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text—1436
LMArena Creative Writing—1415
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper