Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

34.3

Rank #233 Reported

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 19.7.
  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Devstral Small 2505 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
Devstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index34.343.6
Released2025-05-072026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K262K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.28
Results tracked418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
SciCode28.8%—
LMArena Coding—1466

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%—
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1445

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math—1430

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert—1449

Multimodal Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1399
LMArena Japanese—1317
LMArena Korean—1355
LMArena Russian—1412
LMArena Spanish—1434

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following—1428

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query—1442

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text—1423
LMArena Creative Writing—1392
LMArena Multi-Turn—1445

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or MiMo-V2-Omni?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper