Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs Llama 3.1-405B

Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

34.3

Rank #233 Reported

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Devstral Small 2505 scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Devstral Small 2505 leads 38.9 to 33.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.7% for Devstral Small 2505 and 45% for Llama 3.1-405B.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and Llama 3.1-405B specifications
Devstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index34.330.7
Released2025-05-072024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.30—
Results tracked442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Devstral Small 2505 leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
SciCode28.8%—
WeirdML—21.4%
LMArena Coding—1291

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Devstral Small 2505 leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%45%
SimpleBench—23%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1269
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.75
ForecastBench—59.9
HellaSwag—89.2%
PIQA—85.9%
WinoGrande—89.2%

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
LMArena Math—1281
MATH Level 5—49.8%

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
LMArena Expert—1243
ARC (AI2) Challenge—95.3%
MMLU—84.5%
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English—1248
LMArena Chinese—1242
LMArena French—1279
LMArena German—1252
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1184
LMArena Russian—1265
LMArena Spanish—1260

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
IFEval—81.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1259

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query—1266

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text—1284
LMArena Creative Writing—1262
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1297

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Llama 3.1-405B?

Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?

Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Llama 3.1-405B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper