Model comparison
Devstral Small 2505 vs Llama 2-70B
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Devstral Small 2505 leads 38.9 to 31.4.
Side by side
| Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2025-05-07 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Devstral Small 2505 leads
Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1079 |
Reasoning Devstral Small 2505 leads
Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.79 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |
Math Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1091 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 995 |
| LMArena French | — | 1090 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1071 |
Long Context Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1062 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Llama 2-70B?
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Devstral Small 2505 or Llama 2-70B better for coding?
Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Llama 2-70B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.