Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs GLM-4.5

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

34.3

Rank #233 Reported

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Devstral Small 2505 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5 leads 28.6 to 19.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.7% for Devstral Small 2505 and 57.9% for GLM-4.5.
  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.5.
  • GLM-4.5 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and GLM-4.5 specifications
Devstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
ProviderMistral AIZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index34.342.0
Released2025-05-072025-07-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K131K
Max output128K98K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.60
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$2.20
Results tracked427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5 leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%54.2%
SciCode28.8%—
WeirdML—40.6%
LMArena Coding—1434
ALE-Bench—344.82
AlgoTune—1.52

Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%57.9%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1429

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
LMArena Math—1427

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
Humanity's Last Exam—8.3%
Confabulations—11.3%
LMArena Expert—1433

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
LMArena Non-English—1417
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1407
LMArena Japanese—1415
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Russian—1414
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1404

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1412

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GLM-4.5
LMArena Text—1430
LMArena Creative Writing—1395
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1343
LMArena Multi-Turn—1415

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or GLM-4.5?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or GLM-4.5 better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-4.5 does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and GLM-4.5 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper