Model comparison
Devstral Small 2505 vs Gemma 2B
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Devstral Small 2505 leads 38.9 to 29.4.
Side by side
| Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2025-05-07 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Devstral Small 2505 leads
Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 989 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 94.2 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 937 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 970 |
Long Context Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 981 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 945 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Gemma 2B?
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Devstral Small 2505 or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Gemma 2B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.