Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs Gemma 2 27B

Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

33.9

Rank #228 Reported

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.2

Rank #302 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Devstral Small 2505 leads 38.6 to 33.5.
  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
  • Devstral Small 2505 accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and Gemma 2 27B specifications
Devstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Noometry Index33.929.2
Released2025-05-072024-06-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K8K
Max output128K2K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.65
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.65
Results tracked434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Devstral Small 2505 leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.6 (#160), Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
SciCode28.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—42.8%
LiveBench Coding—36%
LMArena Coding—1211
BigCodeBench Complete—52.5%

Reasoning Devstral Small 2505 leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.1 (#243), Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—28.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1199
DTBench—48%
LiveBench Data Analysis—47.9%
LMCA—7.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.06
LiveBench—38.2%

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.4%
LiveBench Math—26.5%
LMArena Math—1212
MATH Level 5—27.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
GPQA Diamond—36.5%
Confabulations—27.1%
LMArena Expert—1172
MMLU—75.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
LMArena Non-English—1217
LMArena Chinese—1221
LMArena French—1246
LMArena German—1209
LMArena Japanese—1175
LMArena Korean—1174
LMArena Russian—1234
LMArena Spanish—1228

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1206

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
LMArena Longer Query—1231

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 2 27B
LMArena Text—1231
LMArena Creative Writing—1241
LMArena Multi-Turn—1224
LiveBench Language—32.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Gemma 2 27B?

Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or Gemma 2 27B?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Devstral Small 2505 does, with 128K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Gemma 2 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper