Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.5 to 39.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 64.6% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1.98 for DeepSeek V4 Pro.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.345.3
Released2026-04-242026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output393K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.66$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$1.98$1.60
Results tracked4832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode28.6%10.2%
SciCode51%45.5%
LMArena Coding14701473
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
WeirdML66.2%—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
APEX-Agents47.3%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%74.8%
CritPt18%9.1%
Chess Puzzles47%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14611460
Mystery Game Puzzles43%17%
DTBench93.9%84%
LMCA45.5%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index155.31147.37
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%93.3%
LMArena Math14551466
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
ProofBench50%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond91.7%87.9%
LMArena Expert14641467
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14391445
LMArena Chinese14861510
LMArena French14721473
LMArena German14581471
LMArena Japanese14451413
LMArena Korean14471415
LMArena Russian14531457
LMArena Spanish14581457

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14481440

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14581455
CL-bench Life13.5%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14511455
LMArena Creative Writing14461439
LMArena Multi-Turn14671460
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1553—
EQ-Bench 41166—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro lists at $0.66 and $1.98.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper