Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.8

Rank #322 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 63.8 to 23.8.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen1.5 4b Chat specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index53.628.8
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1457999
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1444976
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math14271026
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1441980
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1420979
LMArena Chinese14681024
LMArena German1418902
LMArena Russian1428952
LMArena French1439—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1421978

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1434988

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1432997
LMArena Creative Writing1403969
LMArena Multi-Turn1449977
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper