Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs o1-pro

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and o1-pro in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 20.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 89% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 23.3% for o1-pro.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and o1-pro specifications
DeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index53.631.5
Released2026-04-242025-03-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M200K
Max output393K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$150
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$600
Results tracked413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), o1-pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
LMArena Coding1457—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
ARC-AGI-189%23.3%
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
EnigmaEval—6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1444—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), o1-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
GPQA Diamond91%—
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), o1-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1468—
LMArena French1439—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), o1-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1421—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), o1-pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
LMArena Longer Query1434—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), o1-pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flasho1-pro
LMArena Text1432—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than o1-pro?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or o1-pro?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and o1-pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper