Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.2

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 18.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 94.4% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for DeepSeek V4 Flash.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index53.631.2
Released2026-04-242025-06-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M256K
Max output393K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.25
Results tracked416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
LMArena Coding1457—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%40.4%
Chess Puzzles33%1%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49131.74
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1444—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%30.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
ProofBench56%—
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond91%49.1%
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1468—
LMArena French1439—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1421—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Longer Query1434—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Small 3.2
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15591255
LMArena Text1432—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Mistral Small 3.2?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper