Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 2-7B

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 15.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 33% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 0% for Llama 2-7B.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index53.629.1
Released2026-04-242023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4129

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Coding14571002
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
Chess Puzzles33%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14441009
Epoch Capabilities Index154.4999.06
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Math14271042
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Expert14411036
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, Llama 2-7B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1420973
LMArena Chinese1468973
LMArena French1439970
LMArena German1418978
LMArena Russian1428995
LMArena Spanish14361007
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following14211006

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1434999

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Text14321053
LMArena Creative Writing14031033
LMArena Multi-Turn14491029
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Llama 2-7B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 2-7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper