Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 2-13B

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 12.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 90.9% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index53.629.6
Released2026-04-242023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Coding14571062
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
Chess Puzzles33%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14441051
DTBench90.9%42.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49106.17
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
LMCA41.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard—58.2%
HellaSwag—80.7%
LAMBADA—76.5%
PIQA—80.8%
WinoGrande—72.8%

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Math14271065
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—
GSM8K—36.9%

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Expert14411030
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.3%
BoolQ—82.4%
MMLU—55.6%
OpenBookQA—57%
TriviaQA—79.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, Llama 2-13B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English14201024
LMArena Chinese14681001
LMArena French14391044
LMArena German14181009
LMArena Japanese1406894
LMArena Korean1384953
LMArena Russian14281055
LMArena Spanish14361087

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following14211045

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query14341064

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Text14321084
LMArena Creative Writing14031047
LMArena Multi-Turn14491050
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Llama 2-13B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 2-13B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper