Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 27.8.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index53.641.3
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4116

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14571361
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14441374
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math14271359
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert14411339
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English14201363
LMArena Chinese14681417
LMArena French14391391
LMArena German14181355
LMArena Japanese14061342
LMArena Korean13841351
LMArena Russian14281368
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following14211344

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query14341366

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14321377
LMArena Creative Writing14031359
LMArena Multi-Turn14491387
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper