Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Yi-Large

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 52.9 to 36.7.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Yi-Large specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
ProviderDeepSeek01.AI
Noometry Index52.838.1
Released2026-09-092024-05-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.7%
LMArena Coding1506—
BigCodeBench Complete—47.2%
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1483—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Yi-Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—
LMArena Math1477—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
LMArena Expert1506—
MMLU—79.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Yi-Large: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Non-English1448—
LMArena Chinese1497—
LMArena French1452—
LMArena German1484—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Russian1471—
LMArena Spanish1459—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Instruction Following1474—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Text1462—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—
LMArena Multi-Turn1457—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Yi-Large?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Yi-Large better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Yi-Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper