Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-mini Microsoft

36.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 52.9 to 34.6.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Phi-3.5-mini specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index52.836.9
Released2026-09-092024-08-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked375

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
LMArena Coding1506—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.5%
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1483—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—
PIQA—81%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—
LMArena Math1477—
GSM8K—86.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
LMArena Expert1506—
BoolQ—78%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Non-English1448—
LMArena Chinese1497—
LMArena French1452—
LMArena German1484—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Russian1471—
LMArena Spanish1459—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Instruction Following1474—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Text1462—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—
LMArena Multi-Turn1457—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Phi-3.5-mini?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper