Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Palm 2

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 65.4 to 25.6.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Palm 2 specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index52.830.0
Released2026-09-09—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Coding1506994
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14831005
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Math14771049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
LMArena Expert1506—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Non-English1448916
LMArena Chinese1497887
LMArena French1452—
LMArena German1484—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Russian1471—
LMArena Spanish1459—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14741010

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Longer Query14751010

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashPalm 2
LMArena Text14621027
LMArena Creative Writing1435991
LMArena Multi-Turn1457994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Palm 2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Palm 2 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper