Model comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer 30B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 69.9 to 65.8.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.50 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 55.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-09 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 393K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 25 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1493 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | — |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer 30B leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43), Muse Glimmer 30B: 69.9
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | 1798 |
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Muse Glimmer 30B?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Glimmer 30B?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Glimmer 30B lists at $0.35 and $1.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Glimmer 30B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer 30B has 1.