Model comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 50.2 to 10.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 52.8 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-09 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 393K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1619 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1506 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 39.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 19.8% | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 6.5% |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.9 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 67.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 34.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1497 | — |
| LMArena French | 1452 | — |
| LMArena German | 1484 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1459 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1474 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | 1476 |
| LMArena Text | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1457 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.1?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.