Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs InternVL2-40B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

InternVL2-40B Shanghai AI Lab

36.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 39.1 to 33.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and InternVL2-40B specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
ProviderDeepSeekShanghai AI Lab
Noometry Index52.836.6
Released2026-09-092024-07-08
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked371

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), InternVL2-40B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
LMArena Coding1506—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), InternVL2-40B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), InternVL2-40B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1483—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), InternVL2-40B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—
LMArena Math1477—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), InternVL2-40B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
LMArena Expert1506—

Multimodal DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), InternVL2-40B: 33.7

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
LMArena Vision1277—
Video-MME—61.2%
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), InternVL2-40B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
LMArena Non-English1448—
LMArena Chinese1497—
LMArena French1452—
LMArena German1484—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Russian1471—
LMArena Spanish1459—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), InternVL2-40B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
LMArena Instruction Following1474—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), InternVL2-40B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), InternVL2-40B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL2-40B
LMArena Text1462—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—
LMArena Multi-Turn1457—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than InternVL2-40B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and InternVL2-40B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and InternVL2-40B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper