Model comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.1 Fast
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 52.8 to 33.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 54% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 4% for Grok 4.1 Fast.
- Both cost about the same: $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-09 | 2025-06-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Max output | 393K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 25 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | 1241 |
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | 1411 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | 394.93 |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 87.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 89.9% | 87.7% |
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52), Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 54% | 4% |
| LMArena Math | 1493 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97), Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1398 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |
Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | 1411 |
| LMArena German | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1361 |
Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | 1376 |
Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1390 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1394 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | 1327 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1389 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Grok 4.1 Fast?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.1 Fast?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.1 Fast lists at $0.20 and $0.50.
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.1 Fast share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.