Model comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Pro
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 257× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.4 Pro in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 68.3 to 41.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 14.3% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 30% for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 58.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-09 | 2026-03-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 393K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $180 |
| Results tracked | 25 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29), GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 57.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39), GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 14.3% | 30% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | 159.12 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 58.6% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 23.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52), GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 82.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 58.5% |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1493 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 50% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 37.5% |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97), GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 44.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 46.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than GPT-5.4 Pro?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 257× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Pro?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Pro better for coding?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.4 Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 Pro has 16.