Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Falcon-7B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Falcon-7B specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
ProviderDeepSeekTechnology Innovation Institute
Noometry Index52.8—
Released2026-09-092023-04-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Falcon-7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
LMArena Coding1506—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Falcon-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Falcon-7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
Epoch Capabilities Index154.995.1
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1483—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
BIG-Bench Hard—28.8%
HellaSwag—78.1%
LAMBADA—74.9%
PIQA—80.3%
WinoGrande—67.2%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Falcon-7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—
LMArena Math1477—
GSM8K—6.8%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Falcon-7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
LMArena Expert1506—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.9%
BoolQ—75.3%
MMLU—35%
OpenBookQA—51.6%
TriviaQA—64.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Falcon-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Falcon-7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
LMArena Non-English1448—
LMArena Chinese1497—
LMArena French1452—
LMArena German1484—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Russian1471—
LMArena Spanish1459—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Falcon-7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
LMArena Instruction Following1474—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Falcon-7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Falcon-7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashFalcon-7B
LMArena Text1462—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—
LMArena Multi-Turn1457—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Falcon-7B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Falcon-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-7B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper