Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Devstral 2

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Devstral 2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

50.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Devstral 2 Mistral AI

35.8

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 1 category and Devstral 2 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 52.8 to 33.0.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Devstral 2.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Devstral 2 specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index50.335.8
Released2026-09-092025-12-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output393K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$2
Results tracked252

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29), Devstral 2: 33.0 (#253)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
LMArena WebDev16201196
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—53.8%
SciCode51.9%—
LMArena Coding1511—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39), Devstral 2: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1485—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.01—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52), Devstral 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
ProofBench54%—
LMArena Math1493—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97), Devstral 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
LMArena Expert1505—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29), Devstral 2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
LMArena Non-English1452—
LMArena Chinese1506—
LMArena French1448—
LMArena Russian1473—
LMArena Spanish1499—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24), Devstral 2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
LMArena Instruction Following1475—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46), Devstral 2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
LMArena Longer Query1476—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43), Devstral 2: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDevstral 2
LMArena Text1465—
LMArena Creative Writing1436—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—
LMArena Multi-Turn1460—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Devstral 2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Devstral 2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Devstral 2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Devstral 2 lists at $0.40 and $2.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Devstral 2 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Devstral 2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Devstral 2 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper